When the kids won the high school, that was obviously the greatest achievement of my life. Then it was fun at the junior high with so many kids, but hard for it to measure up in importance, in some sense. But what made it an amazing weekend was one special and surprising performance.
William started chess at the beginning of sixth grade, and he was very bad. He was so bad he lost his first 21 rated games. He came every weekend, and he lost and lost and lost. He also played really fast. I liked him because he reminded me a bit of myself at his age: nervous and clumsy and not comfortable in his own skin. He came to chess club every single day. He always tried his hardest; some days he would cry with frustration when he lost. ("I tried my absolute hardest against Anthony, but I still always lose.")
His mother didn't want him to go to nationals; both years she had to be talked into it.
William was in my homeroom this year. He had seven classes a week with me and continued coming to chess club every day. I used Jeff Coakley's "Winning Chess Strategy" as a textbook in his class; William didn't just do the reading each week, he memorized it. I could put up any position from the book on the smartboard and his hand would go up instantly ("I know this; it's mate in seven!").
Even so, he struggled. His rating broke 1100 and he was overjoyed; chess club applauded him. It sank back down below 1000 and he started asking to study every day in chess club-- partly to improve but also because he was afraid to play and lose more .
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Sunday, May 6, 2012
Chess is Child's Play
My friends at Mongoose Press sent me a review copy of their newest, Chess is Child's Play, and I liked it enough to overcome my laziness and read it/think about it/write this.
Basically, Chess is Child's Play is the perfect book for someone who doesn't know anything about chess or teaching and wants everything spelled out. It could be titled The Idiot's Guide to Teaching Chess to One 4-8 Year Old Kid. Now this could be a great thing: if I had to teach a kid how to build a motorcycle, I would want a book like this. And it tells you good things like what to do if your kid is bored or makes this or that type of mistake.
I personally can't read it because it's insanely basic. The whole reason I teach junior high and not elementary is that I cannot stand explaining the totally obvious types of things that this book explains, like how you capture a piece by moving your piece on the square their piece was on and at the same time take their piece off the board and place it with the other captured pieces. But some parts of chess, like determining if a position is or is not checkmate, are complex, multi-step thought processes, and it's nice to have someone walk you through it in such a patient and reassuring way.
It is also a noticably nice-looking book: hard-cover, well designed and laid-out, lots of soft-focus photos of angelic children in gardens playing chess.
bottom line: If you're intimidated by chess and new to teaching, this is a very good book to start with.
Basically, Chess is Child's Play is the perfect book for someone who doesn't know anything about chess or teaching and wants everything spelled out. It could be titled The Idiot's Guide to Teaching Chess to One 4-8 Year Old Kid. Now this could be a great thing: if I had to teach a kid how to build a motorcycle, I would want a book like this. And it tells you good things like what to do if your kid is bored or makes this or that type of mistake.
I personally can't read it because it's insanely basic. The whole reason I teach junior high and not elementary is that I cannot stand explaining the totally obvious types of things that this book explains, like how you capture a piece by moving your piece on the square their piece was on and at the same time take their piece off the board and place it with the other captured pieces. But some parts of chess, like determining if a position is or is not checkmate, are complex, multi-step thought processes, and it's nice to have someone walk you through it in such a patient and reassuring way.
It is also a noticably nice-looking book: hard-cover, well designed and laid-out, lots of soft-focus photos of angelic children in gardens playing chess.
bottom line: If you're intimidated by chess and new to teaching, this is a very good book to start with.
Thursday, May 3, 2012
Repairings at Junior High Nationals
So I have a rules question for everyone.
You may remember a post from two years ago, called Repairings in Elementary Nationals, in which James Black's first round opponent did not show up, and insanity ensued.
This time no one seemed to have had malicious intent, but a strangely similar thing happened to the same person last weekend:
James Black was the second seed in the K-9 open. Five pre-registered players did not show up for round one, and it is USCF policy to repair players without opponents. The 5 players had ratings of 2300 (James), 1800, 1600, 1100, and 900. The TDs paired the 1800 with the 1100, the 1600 with the 900, and gave James a bye. Their reasoning was that this kept the pairings as close as possible to what they would have been originally (the cut for round one was about 1730). I protested, as it seems very strange to me that the top seed should be left unpaired, especially as that has a serious potential effect on his tiebreaks. Modified median is the first tiebreak, and while MM drops the lowest score, it seemed like a big disadvantage to concede that in round one. It also seemed like it would potentially affect the 2nd seed much more than a 900, and so the bye should have gone (as it pretty much always should) to the lowest rated player.
thoughts?
You may remember a post from two years ago, called Repairings in Elementary Nationals, in which James Black's first round opponent did not show up, and insanity ensued.
This time no one seemed to have had malicious intent, but a strangely similar thing happened to the same person last weekend:
James Black was the second seed in the K-9 open. Five pre-registered players did not show up for round one, and it is USCF policy to repair players without opponents. The 5 players had ratings of 2300 (James), 1800, 1600, 1100, and 900. The TDs paired the 1800 with the 1100, the 1600 with the 900, and gave James a bye. Their reasoning was that this kept the pairings as close as possible to what they would have been originally (the cut for round one was about 1730). I protested, as it seems very strange to me that the top seed should be left unpaired, especially as that has a serious potential effect on his tiebreaks. Modified median is the first tiebreak, and while MM drops the lowest score, it seemed like a big disadvantage to concede that in round one. It also seemed like it would potentially affect the 2nd seed much more than a 900, and so the bye should have gone (as it pretty much always should) to the lowest rated player.
thoughts?
Friday, April 27, 2012
JH Nationals. Thursday: Problem Solving Day
Meet some of the hard-working, puzzle-solving members of the IS 318 Under Sections Team! I spent a beautiful Thursday stumping 1100s with problems from Ray Cheng (Practical Chess Exercises) and Jeff Coakley (Winning Chess Exercises for Kids).
We just won the blitz tournament with 42 out of 48 possible points, making IS 318 both High School and Junior High School blitz champions. :)
We have 50 students here: 28 in open, 14 in Under 1250, 6 in Under 1000, and 1 in Under 750. I'm forgetting someone somewhere, I know.
Results throughout the weekend will be here.
| Michael, Vincente, Adam, William |
| Krystian, Austin |
| Isaiah, Chris, Jacob |
| Adam, William, Edmond |
| Edmond |
| William |
| Stefek, Michael, Adam |
| Stefek, Michael |
| Sebastian |
| Zanea, Humriah, Summayah |
| Ashe, Zanea, Humriah, Summayah, Edeli, Jamye |
| Jamye |
| Humriah and Summayah |
| Patryck and Justin |
We have 50 students here: 28 in open, 14 in Under 1250, 6 in Under 1000, and 1 in Under 750. I'm forgetting someone somewhere, I know.
Results throughout the weekend will be here.
Saturday, April 21, 2012
Girls Nationals, Saturday
Maya, Mariah, Shanniah, Edeli, Anita, Haby, Yuxin doing pre-tournament tactics
Edeli played well to beat a 1300 in round 2.
Maya, 2-0
I'm in Chicago with 7 girls for Girls Nationals. Maya, Mariah, Yuxin and Anita are in the 16 and Under section (they are all 13 or 14). They face a team from Hunter of Lilia Poteat, Sophia Flanagan, and Julia Katz. Shanniah, Haby, and Edeli are in the 14 and Under section, but they are the only team in that section. Incredibly, they are all playing 3 hour games every round, so I'm sitting in my hotel room alone, pretty bored. I'm (re)reading Practical Chess Exercises by Ray Cheng-- really good.
Results are here.
Results are here.
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
my match with Donny Ariel
My match with Donny Ariel has, at last, begun! It was conceived of 7 or 8 years ago, when several people were betting a total of $10,000 on whether I would manage to score 0.5/10 (a draw) or 1/10 (when "my backers" would win). Donny reconsidered at the last minute back then, but then nostalgically called me last week, and we played a g/90 9 second delay game yesterday.
(28) Spiegel,Elizabeth - Ariel,Donny [B22]
1.e4 c5 2.c3 e6 3.d4 d5 4.exd5 exd5 5.Nf3 Nf6 6.Bb5+ Bd7 7.Qe2+ Be7 8.Ne5 0-0 9.Nxd7 Nbxd7 10.Be3 c4 11.Ba4 Bd6 12.Nd2 Qc7 13.g3 Rae8 14.Bc2 b5 15.0-0 Ne4 16.Nxe4 dxe4 17.f3 f5 18.fxe4 fxe4 19.Rxf8+ Nxf8 20.Kg2 Nd7 21.Rf1 Nf6 22.Bg5 Qe7 23.a4 a6 24.axb5 axb5 25.Bxf6 gxf6 26.Qh5 Rb8 27.Qd5+ Kg7 28.Bxe4 b4 29.Qf5 Kg8 30.Bd5+ Kg7 31.Qg4+ Kh8 32.Bxc4 bxc3 33.bxc3 Qe3 34.Rxf6 Qxc3 35.Bd5 Be7 36.Rf7 Qd2+ 37.Rf2 Qg5 38.Qe4 Bf6 39.h4 Qg7 40.Be6 Rf8 41.d5 Be7 42.Rxf8+ Qxf8
(28) Spiegel,Elizabeth - Ariel,Donny [B22]
1.e4 c5 2.c3 e6 3.d4 d5 4.exd5 exd5 5.Nf3 Nf6 6.Bb5+ Bd7 7.Qe2+ Be7 8.Ne5 0-0 9.Nxd7 Nbxd7 10.Be3 c4 11.Ba4 Bd6 12.Nd2 Qc7 13.g3 Rae8 14.Bc2 b5 15.0-0 Ne4 16.Nxe4 dxe4 17.f3 f5 18.fxe4 fxe4 19.Rxf8+ Nxf8 20.Kg2 Nd7 21.Rf1 Nf6 22.Bg5 Qe7 23.a4 a6 24.axb5 axb5 25.Bxf6 gxf6 26.Qh5 Rb8 27.Qd5+ Kg7 28.Bxe4 b4 29.Qf5 Kg8 30.Bd5+ Kg7 31.Qg4+ Kh8 32.Bxc4 bxc3 33.bxc3 Qe3 34.Rxf6 Qxc3 35.Bd5 Be7 36.Rf7 Qd2+ 37.Rf2 Qg5 38.Qe4 Bf6 39.h4 Qg7 40.Be6 Rf8 41.d5 Be7 42.Rxf8+ Qxf8
![]() |
| white to move and win |
I was about to make the excuse to you that I had only 20 seconds left here, but then I realized this happens to me in every endgame-- I don't know what to do; I spend a lot of time thinking about it, then I'm low on time and play badly and say "well, but what could I do; I had no time." The real problem is that I usually don't care anymore by move 35; I just want it to be over. I traded queens stupidly, (Qf5) but white has a great move here.
I let you think about it and then post the answer tomorrow, hopefully. I'm going to Minneapolis tomorrow for high school nationals. We'll have a team in open and in under 1600-- 19 kids.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




